Ignorance of the literature

The public must be educated part (which is easy), schools do not teach a view of literature as a whole, or their relationship with others. Often, teachers are viewing this topic better than the head, of course. There are literary masterpieces out there, but most of them are not what we think they are. Hemingway, Faulkner, Fitzgerald, Joyce ("Ulysses", his masterpiece is only a rash Picasso), as called the work of Gertrude Stein, no one is what I twisted masterpiecein them, so interesting, but far from being selected in the category was added, much worse than the Odyssey. Excuse us for the selection of these players, I have most of all Their works read, and as they are, are poor versions for a Nobel Prize for literature, or the prize in literature, to fill the well to be Top Shelf .

Hemingway or Faulkner went to college, and you can say that in their writings, the complete redundancy. If so, what areClasses at school then the literature is needed to be pushed aside and locked in an old chest, something different. The recent past has miscalculations in awkwardness hammered their selections of garbage; Emergence was right when he said Nathaniel Hawthorn was forgotten and unprofessional, and lazy in his writings, and that North America is in the selection begins to be the second best among best and now we are up to five best is the best. EE Cummings, who with his great truth of poetry, a fewI like a number of countless and Ezra Pound, a great thinker of his time in the literature, perhaps has come close to what could have ... but has never been.

So where should I start with this? Despite this impasse for the contemporary scene, may be requested that the authors try in the future, show a mix of everything not only making them more expandable and compressible in the categories of Their choice to write, Which if you want literature, and I thinkThe prices are a deterrent to good works, great writers, perhaps not the prices, simply because they have connections.

Most people do not know the concept of comparative literature, including college students literature. We face a low reader students what he must appeal once again, reading books, but we are on American taste, they do not like Hamburger, pizza, chicken and roll is approached from the assembly lines they put in a box of lead, andwas born in a bookstore that sells only run of the mill vendors, the new arrivals. Many libraries do this now, I'm not inventing

It is for most people write paragraphs ordered a hard, certainly was for Faulkner, I do not know do not feel bad, and Sherwood Anderson, who was rarely an issue, or connection of the plot, But he was responsible for His time. I'm waiting for the lights, and nobody seems to find these days most of it in literature. The Epic of Gilgamesh is obviously great, andmost of these works.

The literature is not defined as complicated as people make it, not be defined too often, common sense and not used that often is not common in written form, simple procedures, a theme, plot and vision to bear clear; discoveries where you go, make it organized, not piecemeal as Faulkner or Joyce, or EE Cummings poetry. If the sentence to avoid confusion? No, where you go, there was; approach to literature as if it is a library(Categorical or division), do not share as a scientist. One thing must be related to others - partnerships. It seems that we accepted in our freedom, liberty as unsatisfactory, in our literature, it sounds like it is probably too much, no matter if you like Charles, and Bill not be true for the literature to get it right, spelling is just lazy This is the My hang-ups are still a computer, and write more wrong than me, if onlyTypewriter, but again, not laziness to do intelligent, but unacceptable in the long run because it can be resolved quickly.

0 ความคิดเห็น: